> > There are two distinct problems here that I'd like to discuss > > separately: XSP as actions and the Action interface. > > +0 on xsps as actions. sure, it might be nice to leverage existing > logicsheets in xsp actions, but writing a standalone action class is quite > easy anyway. ...as long as they are quite static. If you start to try to configure them via XML descriptor you wish Cocoon would give you a helping hand. -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Berin Loritsch
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Giacomo Pati
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Steele, Tony
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? giacomo
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Jeremy Quinn
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Donald Ball
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Torsten Curdt
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? giacomo
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Berin Loritsch
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Torsten Curdt