David, I'm not a lawyer, etc, but it looks to me that 1999-@year@ is better then just @year@. What do you think? :)
Vadim > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs license.xml > > crossley 01/10/29 05:31:59 > > Modified: documentation/xdocs license.xml > Log: > Use Ant replacement macro @year@ (was hard-coded "1999-2000") > > Revision Changes Path > 1.3 +1 -1 xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs/license.xml > > Index: license.xml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs/license.xml,v > retrieving revision 1.2 > retrieving revision 1.3 > diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 > --- license.xml 2001/10/25 07:49:12 1.2 > +++ license.xml 2001/10/29 13:31:59 1.3 > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ > The Apache Software License, Version 1.1 > ======================================================================== ==== > > - Copyright (C) 1999-2000 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. > + Copyright (C) @year@ The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. > > Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modifica- > tion, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
