Hi Vadim, i was just aligning license.xml with LICENSE. The former had it hard-coded. The token @year@ is defined in build.xml to expand to the date-range "1999-2001". Yes, "year" was a strange choice of token names, but that is what is currently used. --David
Vadim said: > I'm not a lawyer, etc, but it looks to me that 1999-@year@ is better > then just @year@. > What do you think? :) > > Vadim > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:32 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs license.xml > > > > crossley 01/10/29 05:31:59 > > > > Modified: documentation/xdocs license.xml > > Log: > > Use Ant replacement macro @year@ (was hard-coded "1999-2000") > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.3 +1 -1 xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs/license.xml > > > > Index: license.xml > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs/license.xml,v > > retrieving revision 1.2 > > retrieving revision 1.3 > > diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 > > --- license.xml 2001/10/25 07:49:12 1.2 > > +++ license.xml 2001/10/29 13:31:59 1.3 > > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ > > The Apache Software License, Version 1.1 > > > ======================================================================== > ==== > > > > - Copyright (C) 1999-2000 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights > reserved. > > + Copyright (C) @year@ The Apache Software Foundation. All rights > reserved. > > > > Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > modifica- > > tion, are permitted provided that the following conditions are > met: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
