Giacomo Pati wrote: > Quoting David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > There are SIX DAYS TO GO until the agreed date for the > > final release. We also agreed that the date should not slip. > > > > In my opinion, 2.0 is not yet fit for release. So there is only > > one option ... hold the RT threads and get on with the job. > > --David > > What is it you think needs to be fixed before releaseing it? > Giacomo
** Documentation, documentation, documentation - stop apologising for Cocoon 1 - positive announcement.xml and index.xml - both of those docs need a concise overiew at top (something less than half-a-page that convinces boss) - much of the documentation is old and still talks about Cocoon 1 configuration methods and issues - much documentation still has "Under construction" notices - people will turn away in droves ** cocoon.xconf needs all parameters and components listed and briefly explained as internal documentation ** The excellent document "How to Develop Web Applications" and the accompanying webapp.tutorial are missing from the cocoon_20_branch ** Better stylesheet for xml.apache.org/cocoon2/ - the slow response of the website will not allow 2.0 to make its impact. Also the following issues are summarised at documentation/xdocs/plan/release.xml ... ** We have many open bugs in bugzilla ** Layout the distribution ** Ensure that licensing requirements have been met ** Decide what to backport from the 2.1 head --David > > -------------------------- > > > Subject: [C2.0] Should we set a date for 2.0 Final Release? > > > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:55:15 +0200 > > > From: Martin Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > Ok, yes, I didnt check the calendar. Thanks for the hint! > > > > > > > > As I still prefer mondays, we should set the dates to > > > > 5th November: RC2 > > > > 26th November: Final Release > > > > > > yep, my +1 also for both dates, BTW: without looking to the > > > repository, do we have actualized TODO list... I mean critical > > > isuues (not including documentation) to fix ??? > > > > -------------------------- > > > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:37:57 +0200 > > > From: "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > you're absolutely right. It's the same problem here. > > > Due to the many changes I would propose a RC2. > > > But we still need more documentation! So a good > > > date could be 1st of November for the RC2 and > > > end of november for the final release. > > > > > > But whatever date we decide on for the final > > > release, we *should* stick to it. > > > > > > Carsten > > > Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated > > > ================================================================ > > > Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn > > > www.sundn.de mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ================================================================ > > > > > > Dims wrote: > > > > Team, > > > > Should we set a date for 2.0 Final Release? (or the next Release > > > > Candidate)? Am a bit tired of > > > > hearing from people (in my organization) that we cannot switch > > > > from C1.X to C2.0 since it is in > > > > Beta/RC Cycle.... > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > dims > > > > ===== > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
