Thank you Bernhard for working on the Velocity documentation. I've been meaning to send Carsten the patch this week like I promised, but you beat me to it!
Regards, --mike On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Bernhard Huber wrote: > Hi, > some documentation about cinclude, and xinclude as it is frequentyl > requested. > and i copied from javadoc docu about velocity generator. > docs are zipped up and attached > bye bernhard > > David Crossley wrote: > > >Giacomo Pati wrote: > > > >>Quoting David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >>>There are SIX DAYS TO GO until the agreed date for the > >>>final release. We also agreed that the date should not slip. > >>> > >>>In my opinion, 2.0 is not yet fit for release. So there is only > >>>one option ... hold the RT threads and get on with the job. > >>>--David > >>> > >>What is it you think needs to be fixed before releaseing it? > >>Giacomo > >> > > > >** Documentation, documentation, documentation > >- stop apologising for Cocoon 1 > >- positive announcement.xml and index.xml > >- both of those docs need a concise overiew at top > >(something less than half-a-page that convinces boss) > >- much of the documentation is old and still talks about > >Cocoon 1 configuration methods and issues > >- much documentation still has "Under construction" notices > >- people will turn away in droves > > > >** cocoon.xconf needs all parameters and components > >listed and briefly explained as internal documentation > > > >** The excellent document "How to Develop Web Applications" > >and the accompanying webapp.tutorial are missing from > >the cocoon_20_branch > > > >** Better stylesheet for xml.apache.org/cocoon2/ > >- the slow response of the website will not allow 2.0 to > >make its impact. > > > >Also the following issues are summarised at > >documentation/xdocs/plan/release.xml ... > > > >** We have many open bugs in bugzilla > >** Layout the distribution > >** Ensure that licensing requirements have been met > >** Decide what to backport from the 2.1 head > > > >--David > > > >>>-------------------------- > >>> > >>>>Subject: [C2.0] Should we set a date for 2.0 Final Release? > >>>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:55:15 +0200 > >>>>From: Martin Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>>Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Ok, yes, I didnt check the calendar. Thanks for the hint! > >>>>> > >>>>>As I still prefer mondays, we should set the dates to > >>>>>5th November: RC2 > >>>>>26th November: Final Release > >>>>> > >>>>yep, my +1 also for both dates, BTW: without looking to the > >>>>repository, do we have actualized TODO list... I mean critical > >>>>isuues (not including documentation) to fix ??? > >>>> > >>>-------------------------- > >>> > >>>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:37:57 +0200 > >>>>From: "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > >>>>you're absolutely right. It's the same problem here. > >>>>Due to the many changes I would propose a RC2. > >>>>But we still need more documentation! So a good > >>>>date could be 1st of November for the RC2 and > >>>>end of november for the final release. > >>>> > >>>>But whatever date we decide on for the final > >>>>release, we *should* stick to it. > >>>> > >>>>Carsten > >>>>Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated > >>>>================================================================ > >>>>Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn > >>>>www.sundn.de mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>================================================================ > >>>> > >>>>Dims wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Team, > >>>>>Should we set a date for 2.0 Final Release? (or the next Release > >>>>>Candidate)? Am a bit tired of > >>>>>hearing from people (in my organization) that we cannot switch > >>>>>from C1.X to C2.0 since it is in > >>>>>Beta/RC Cycle.... > >>>>> > >>>>>Thanks, > >>>>>dims > >>>>>===== > >>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/ > >>>>> > >>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
