Hi, I think that issue is interesting for all of us. Maybe some of you have additional comments.
Gerhard --------------------------------- Never share a foxhole with anyone braver than you are. --------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:06 AM >To: 'Gerhard Froehlich' >Subject: RE: patch politics > > >Hi, > >Good question. Sometimes I also think why people submitting things only >into HEAD, and not into branch. I think that: > >1. If this is a bug fix - _definitely_ should go to both branches, >2. If something is totally new (like DBXML: protocol or Lucene search) - >it for sure goes into HEAD, >3. Something in between, but does not breaks backward compatibility - >_may_ go into both (and may not), >4. Everything else - I guess vote might be required here, so first it >may go into HEAD, and then be VOTEd in order to sync this into branch. >Another way is to commit changes and wait for reaction ;) > >Also, things like code cleanup or performance improvements should go to >both branches. > >This is my suggestions - others could have other opinions. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gerhard Froehlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:36 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: patch politics >> >> Hi Vadim, >> how do you decide if a patch belong in the HEAD branch >> or in both?? >> >> TIA >> Gerhard >> >> >> -------------------------- >> Hey! It compiles! Ship it! >> -------------------------- > >:))) > > >Vadim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
