On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Gerhard Froehlich wrote:

> Hi,
> I think that issue is interesting for all of
> us. Maybe some of you have additional
> comments.
>
>   Gerhard
>
> ---------------------------------
> Never share a foxhole with anyone
> braver than you are.
> ---------------------------------
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:06 AM
> >To: 'Gerhard Froehlich'
> >Subject: RE: patch politics
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Good question. Sometimes I also think why people submitting things only
> >into HEAD, and not into branch. I think that:
> >
> >1. If this is a bug fix - _definitely_ should go to both branches,
> >2. If something is totally new (like DBXML: protocol or Lucene search) -
> >it for sure goes into HEAD,
> >3. Something in between, but does not breaks backward compatibility -
> >_may_ go into both (and may not),
> >4. Everything else - I guess vote might be required here, so first it
> >may go into HEAD, and then be VOTEd in order to sync this into branch.
> >Another way is to commit changes and wait for reaction ;)
> >
> >Also, things like code cleanup or performance improvements should go to
> >both branches.

Well, I'll clean up the HEAD branch slowly but I don't have the time to
do it in the 2.0 branch as well. I'd suggest to move the head to
release quality and only patch the 2.0 branch for bugs. This way we can
get rid of the 2.0 branch sooner than later (which was always the
proposed way to go IIRC).

Giacomo

> >
> >This is my suggestions - others could have other opinions.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gerhard Froehlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:36 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: patch politics
> >>
> >> Hi Vadim,
> >> how do you decide if a patch belong in the HEAD branch
> >> or in both??
> >>
> >> TIA
> >>   Gerhard
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------------------
> >> Hey! It compiles! Ship it!
> >> --------------------------
> >
> >:)))
> >
> >
> >Vadim
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to