On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 12:40:06 +0300, "Mikhail Fedotov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > In fact, if you look at the semantics, XSLT is pure functional
> > language, admitely with no possibility of defining new functions
> > at runtime.
> 
> Check out
>  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xsl-list/2001-11/msg01096.html

Interesting example, thanks for the pointer! I liked the clever usage
of templates to walk on the data structure computed for the store.


Greetings,
-- 
Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://orion.rgv.hp.com/ (inside HP's firewall only)
http://sourceforge.net/users/ovidiu/ (my SourceForge page)
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/ (GNU, Emacs, other stuff)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to