On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 12:40:06 +0300, "Mikhail Fedotov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In fact, if you look at the semantics, XSLT is pure functional > > language, admitely with no possibility of defining new functions > > at runtime. > > Check out > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xsl-list/2001-11/msg01096.html Interesting example, thanks for the pointer! I liked the clever usage of templates to walk on the data structure computed for the store. Greetings, -- Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://orion.rgv.hp.com/ (inside HP's firewall only) http://sourceforge.net/users/ovidiu/ (my SourceForge page) http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/ (GNU, Emacs, other stuff) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]