giacomo wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:11:17 +0100 (CET), giacomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 23:14:10 +0100 (CET), giacomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > IMHO don't use XML to create a programming language.
> > > > >
> > > > > And IMHO we havn't seen the real need for a programming language to
> > > > > describe a flowmap (and this thread *is* about flowmaps):
> > > >
> > > > I thought my shopping cart example was a good demonstration of where a
> > > > programming language with continuations support might benefit
> > > > application writers. Wasn't that a clear example of how such a beast
> > > > would be useful?
> > >
> > > I probably missed that one :(
> >
> > OK, check it out at:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=100802231017059&w=2
>
> Thanks.
>
> > The example shows how a real world problem could be implemented in a
> > language with continuations.
>
> I've probably missed the best part of the hole thread. This way looks
> mutch better. Sorry guys, I had missleaded impressions.
No prob. It was useful as a hardness test for syntactic impedence
mismatches :)
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
