On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > giacomo wrote: > > > Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author line > > as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust > > the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon. > > > Well, this was the right time to remind me that I forgot to do it myself > to the code I contributed :) > > However, I found out that there seems to be no consistency between us in > CVS keywords. Wouldn't it be the case to agree on a consistent way to > insert version tags in the source? Basically someone is using $Id$ > (including myself) while others seems to use "CVS $Revision$ $Date$". Is > there already a standard that I'm missing or should we come up with one?
I don't know of a standard, so my proposal is to use $Id$ as well because it is mostly complete concerning information inserted into the checked in files. Giacomo > > Ciao, > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
