> From: giacomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > > > giacomo wrote: > > > > > Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author line > > > as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust > > > the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon. > > > > > > Well, this was the right time to remind me that I forgot to do it myself > > to the code I contributed :) > > > > However, I found out that there seems to be no consistency between us in > > CVS keywords. Wouldn't it be the case to agree on a consistent way to > > insert version tags in the source? Basically someone is using $Id$ > > (including myself) while others seems to use "CVS $Revision$ $Date$". Is > > there already a standard that I'm missing or should we come up with one? > > I don't know of a standard, so my proposal is to use $Id$ as well > because it is mostly complete concerning information inserted into the > checked in files.
How about both: Id on top of the file, and Revision/Date in Javadoc? PS I do remember myself asking same question on this list. Nobody had an opinion at the moment ;) Vadim > > Giacomo > > > > > Ciao, > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
