> > > > > > Is the LOgKitManagement able to handle LogEnabled components? > > > > > > LogKitManager itself is LogEnabled. but It manage org.apache.log.Logger. > > > It depend of LogKit. > > [snip] > > > > > Well, I assumed - since Loggable got deprecated... (I thought _you_ > > > > > would be the one who knows it for sure ;) > > > > > > > > I wrote it but I don't know if someone else had changed it to support > > > > LogEnabled. > > > > > > Me. ;-) > > > > Great! I will move HEAD over to LogEnabled over Xmas then. > > > > See (well,read) you guys in a few days! > > Cool. After that I need a day or two of no activity to restructure the > repository tree.
While upgrading to LogEnabled I realized that even Excalibur still uses AbstractLoggable. This makes upgrading cocoon a bit more ugly. Having the cocoon components using LogEnabled and the excalibur components Loggable seems not very desireable. So I propose to wait until Excalibur has moved to LogEnabled. It's probably not worth the hassle right now. I'll keep the scripts and volunteer to do it later. Giacomo, if you like to restructure the repository tree now - go ahead. Wish you and everyone else a happy new year! Take care guys! -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
