On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > > > > > Is the LOgKitManagement able to handle LogEnabled components? > > > > > > > > LogKitManager itself is LogEnabled. but It manage org.apache.log.Logger. > > > > It depend of LogKit. > > > [snip] > > > > > > Well, I assumed - since Loggable got deprecated... (I thought _you_ > > > > > > would be the one who knows it for sure ;) > > > > > > > > > > I wrote it but I don't know if someone else had changed it to support > > > > > LogEnabled. > > > > > > > > Me. ;-) > > > > > > Great! I will move HEAD over to LogEnabled over Xmas then. > > > > > > See (well,read) you guys in a few days! > > > > Cool. After that I need a day or two of no activity to restructure the > > repository tree. > > While upgrading to LogEnabled I realized that even Excalibur still uses > AbstractLoggable. This makes upgrading cocoon a bit more ugly. > Having the cocoon components using LogEnabled and the excalibur components > Loggable seems not very desireable. > > So I propose to wait until Excalibur has moved to LogEnabled. It's > probably not worth the hassle right now. I'll keep the scripts and > volunteer to do it later.
Ok, cool. > Giacomo, if you like to restructure the repository tree now - go ahead. Yes, I'll do it in the next few days. > Wish you and everyone else a happy new year! > Take care guys! Same to you ;) Giacomo > -- > Torsten > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
