I don't have the right to vote here, but I find the new logo much more "distinctive" and "modern".
IMHO comparing both logos out-of-context like from these URLs > On Sunday 30 December 2001 17:50, giacomo wrote: > . . . > 1. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon1/images/cocoon.jpg > 2. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/images/cocoon.gif > . . . Doesn't do justice to the new logo which I think integrates better in a page, and draws attention by being harder to read. To me the new logo looks more like "artwork" than the old one which I see as "the word Cocoon written in a funny way". My 2 cents... -- -- Bertrand Delacrétaz, www.codeconsult.ch -- web technologies consultant - OO, Java, XML, C++ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
