Hi team, I just did some time measurements to compare the compiled and interpreted sitemap engines. The tests were done on a 1GHz Win2K PC running JDK 1.3.1/server hotspot and Tomcat 4.0.
I used "ab" to load-test two pages with 1000 requests : - the welcome page (cocoon/welcome) which involves a simple generate/transform/serialize pipeline - the main docs page (cocoon/documents/index.html) which is a huge aggregation of "cocoon:" sources. Several 1000 page requests were run and their result ignored to allow the hotspot to do its job. The results are as follows, in requets/second : page | compiled |interpreted | ---------+------------+------------| welcome | 105 | 115 | docs | 37 | 35 | These results are quite encouraging since simple pipelines are a faster in interpreted mode. For the "docs" page, I have to check the code for both aggregate and cocoon: to gain the few millisecs that are needed to beat the compiled engine ; Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies - http://www.anyware-tech.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
