Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Hi team,
>
> I just did some time measurements to compare the compiled and
> interpreted sitemap engines. The tests were done on a 1GHz Win2K PC
> running JDK 1.3.1/server hotspot and Tomcat 4.0.
>
> I used "ab" to load-test two pages with 1000 requests :
> - the welcome page (cocoon/welcome) which involves a simple
> generate/transform/serialize pipeline
> - the main docs page (cocoon/documents/index.html) which is a huge
> aggregation of "cocoon:" sources.
>
> Several 1000 page requests were run and their result ignored to allow
> the hotspot to do its job.
>
> The results are as follows, in requets/second :
>
> page | compiled |interpreted |
> ---------+------------+------------|
> welcome | 105 | 115 |
> docs | 37 | 35 |
>
> These results are quite encouraging since simple pipelines are a faster
> in interpreted mode.
>
> For the "docs" page, I have to check the code for both aggregate and
> cocoon: to gain the few millisecs that are needed to beat the compiled
> engine ;
All I can say is 'great job' and keep it up!
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
