Ovidiu Predescu wrote:

> This looks really promising! Could you elaborate on what caused this
> major performance boost?



Looking at it again, the biggest performance boost was figuring out the
requests for minutes, and reporting it for a second.  It was a bad math error,
and I appologize for that.

In essence, we have cut down to 2/3 the speed we had about a week ago.


> 
> Thanks,
> Ovidiu
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:13:24 -0500, Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
>>I ran another round of load tests on Cocoon, and the results are much more 
>encouraging.
>>I noticed just how much quicker Cocoon was at rendering the Avalon site, so here are 
>my
>>numbers:
>>
>>URL 
>>                                      num requests     max time        min time      
> average  
>>      std-dev
>>http://localhost/cocoon/documents/index.html 
>>  40.00                1,422.00        20.00          128.20          251.70
>>http://localhost/cocoon/hello.html 
>>       78.00           1,542.00        0              234.40          440.06
>>http://localhost/cocoon/hello.svg 
>>       73.00           701.00          0              41.56           92.15
>>http://localhost/cocoon/hello.wrl 
>>       73.00           851.00          0              52.70           132.17
>>http://localhost/cocoon/i18n/simple.xsp 
>>       41.00           1,722.00        40.00          263.02          392.57
>>http://localhost/cocoon/moreover/moreover.xml 
>>  61.00               113,033.00       12,708.00      38,660.79       21,067.11
>>http://localhost/cocoon/slashdot/slashdot.xml 
>>  68.00                23,013.00       391.00          9,100.29        7,168.80
>>http://localhost/cocoon/welcome 
>>               78.00           881.00          10.00           55.56           104.27
>>http://localhost/cocoon/xsp/simple 
>>       40.00           280.00          20.00           77.63           56.06
>>TOTAL 
>>                                       552.00          113,033.00      0             
> 5,401.57 
>>       7,050.03
>>TOTAL (minus remote)                           423.00          1,722.00        0     
>          12
>>1.87   154.28
>>
>>
>>When you consider even the painfully slow pages like moreover.xml and slashdot.xml, 
>your average 
>>number of
>>requests per second is only 11.11.
>>
>>However, when all resources are local, we have an average of 492.34 requests per 
>second.
>>
>>This is almost 400% improvement over about a week ago.
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>
>>"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
>>  deserve neither liberty nor safety."
>>                 - Benjamin Franklin
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> .
> 
> 



-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                 - Benjamin Franklin


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to