> From: DZIEMBOWSKI,KINGA (HP-NewJersey,ex2) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Vadim, > The document you are sending contains two <Body> in the case of this example > it will not work. <Body> is expected to be unique. Invent some other > modification of the document.
How come? It works! When <body> are embedded in each other - it works. Looking at all this I see an opportunity to rewrite all SQL / LDAP / XMLDB / Include / I18N / Lucene / etc transformers as a single Dispatcher and a bunch of handlers, reacting on namespaced tags, and working on a SAX stream. What do you think? On the other side, it reminds me somehow about reactor pattern in the Cocoon 1 and that it was not good enough for some reason... Vadim > Kinga > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:18 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Dispatcher/Adapter > > > > > > No, I used online sample with: > > > > <Envelope> > > <Body> > > <SomeTag>This is a part of the Body node tree</SomeTag> > > </Body> > > <Body> > > <SomeTag>This is a part of the Body node tree</SomeTag> > > </Body> > > <OtherTag>This is not a part of the Body node tree</OtherTag> > > </Envelope> > > > > :) > > > > Vadim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
