On Friday, February 8, 2002, at 06:54 pm, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Since I've see that the Xerces jar is about 1.6Mb, I remade it with
> compression on and the resulting size is 834kb. I haven't checked the
> other jars, but IMHO bandwith could benefit from some compression.
There's supposed to be a trade off between compression and runtime speed
unless this is another performance tuning rule that doesn't apply anymore.
I've always wondered what difference to performance it would make to:
a) Merge all the jar files together into one (uncompressed) file.
b) Extract out all the jar files into the same filespace and run them
outside of a jar.
Unfortunately I've never had time to give it a try!
Stuart.
Public Key - 1024D/88DD65AF 2001-11-23 Stuart Roebuck (Adolos)
Key fingerprint = 89D9 E405 F8B1 9B22 0FA2 F2C1 9E57 5AB1 88DD 65AF
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stuart Roebuck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Architect Java, XML, MacOS X, XP, etc.
ADOLOS <http://www.adolos.com/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
