giacomo wrote: >On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > ><sniped/> > >>As for the last issue with view and aggregation, could some view-guru >>explain exactly how are to be handled the different parts of an >>aggregate with the different cases (no label, label on map:part and/or >>map:generate). >> > >There has been a thread on that weeks ago between Stefano and me. You'll >have to look in the archives. > >Giacomo > Could you please confirm that views on aggregation is defined as follows ?
<map:part> : - if no view is requested, all parts are added, - if the requested view corresponds to one of the labels of at least one of the parts, only matching parts are added, - if the requested view doesn't correspond to any of the labels of any of the parts, all parts are added, just like when no view is requested. <map:aggregate> : - acts like a generator, i.e. it reacts to its label and views from-position="first", - handling of an aggregate's label is independent from the labels of its parts, i.e. it doesn't depend on whether some parts were filtered or not. This mainly on the third point for <map:part> (the view doesn't match any label of any part) that I'd like confirmation. Thanks, Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies - http://www.anyware-tech.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
