Sylvain Wallez wrote: > giacomo wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote: >> >>> giacomo wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote: >>>> >>>> <sniped/> >>>> >>>>> As for the last issue with view and aggregation, could some view-guru >>>>> explain exactly how are to be handled the different parts of an >>>>> aggregate with the different cases (no label, label on map:part >>>>> and/or >>>>> map:generate). >>>>> >>>> There has been a thread on that weeks ago between Stefano and me. >>>> You'll >>>> have to look in the archives. >>>> >>>> Giacomo >>>> >>> Could you please confirm that views on aggregation is defined as >>> follows ? >>> >>> <map:part> : >>> - if no view is requested, all parts are added, >>> - if the requested view corresponds to one of the labels of at least >>> one >>> of the parts, only matching parts are added, >>> - if the requested view doesn't correspond to any of the labels of any >>> of the parts, all parts are added, just like when no view is requested. >>> >>> <map:aggregate> : >>> - acts like a generator, i.e. it reacts to its label and views >>> from-position="first", >>> - handling of an aggregate's label is independent from the labels of >>> its >>> parts, i.e. it doesn't depend on whether some parts were filtered or >>> not. >>> >>> This mainly on the third point for <map:part> (the view doesn't match >>> any label of any part) that I'd like confirmation. >>> >> >> Well, I have to dig into the sitemap.xsl and some other code to really >> see how I've implemented it (cannot remember by heart). >> > Mmmh, since this specification comes from a reverse engineering of > sitemap.xsl, don't loose time digging ;) > > I'll correct the current aggregate/view bug in interpreted sitemap so > that it conforms to this, and we'll see if it's satisfactory.
Corrected ! It seems to behave as expected, and docs are now generated correctly (before it failed producing links). Ken, you can now make a full performance test for docs generation with the interpreted sitemap. However I suggest for this test to change the log-level to warning since the interpreted sitemap gives a lot more info messages than the compiled one. Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies - http://www.anyware-tech.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
