On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Greg Weinger wrote:

> > I have another one, it provides different functionality but it
> features
> > similar approach. As I don't have a name for this (multiplexer?), here
> > is the diagram:
> >
> >                   - pipeline1 -
> >                  /              \
> > request -> A -> X - pipeline2 - X -> C -> response
> >                  \              /
> >                   - pipelineN -
> >
> > Explanation:
> > 1. Request goes in
> > 2. Pipeline is being constructed from A, X, C
> > 3. SAX events passed from the A to X, where they are dispatched (same
> as
> > separator) to several other pipelines
> > 4. SAX events passed from these events reassembled into the one SAX
> > stream by the same instance of X component
> > 5. Result passed down the original pipeline to the C
> > 6. C spits out the response
> >
> > Don't answer "hey, you can do this with content aggregator" - it is
> not
> > true, this is a different thing.
> >
> > Waiting for comments...
>
>
> Tell me if this is different from what you're talking about: a
> Transformer/Generator pair that acts like a combination of (modified)
> FragmentExtractor and CInclude.
>
> Say we have a MultiplexingTransformer [MT] in a pipeline like this:
>
>
>       Request --> G -> T -> MT -> S --> Response
>
>
> MultiplexingTransformer calls 1-n pipleines via the cocoon:/ protocol.
> The MultiplexingTransformer byte-compiles all the SAX events within a
> given element, like this:
>
>       <mx:dispatch src="cocoon:/otheruri"
> xmlns:mx="http://multiplexer";>
>
>             . . . xml elements . . .
>
>       </mx:dispatch>
>
> And forwards the XMLFragment in a request attribute.
>
> A MultiplexingGenerator [MG], at the head of each of the 1-n pipelines
> retrieves and serialzes the XMLFragment.
>
>         Request --> MG -> T -> S --> Response
>
> This is very similar to something I'm currently working on.  If other
> people would find it useful, I will generalize this and offer it up.
>
> Or did you have some other pipeline component magic in mind?  :)


Did I get you guys right? You want to merge XML streams?

Merging XML is a tough one...
--
Torsten


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to