> From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > > From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >
<snip/> > > > Did I get you guys right? You want to merge XML streams? > > > > Split, pass through several pipelines, and merge together. > > > > > > > Merging XML is a tough one... > > > > Not (much) tougher than CIncludeTransformer and ContentAggegator :) > > Well, our CA is currently not really merging but including parts into a > new document. I though that's the difference: merging instead of > including. If not - I didn't get the difference to CA correctly... Difference between CA and thing proposed is that in CA map:part decides where from it gets XML, and in this proposal "multiplexer" streams SAX events to the sub-pipelines, replacing generator defined in the sitemap. Hence the picture: split, feed to several pipelines, and merge results. Vadim > -- > Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
