I wouldn't mind removing any show-stoppers... The link you guys quote doesn't work, however :-(
--Jacek --- "Lewis, Andrew J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To whom must we beg for this to be a high priority? > :) > > > ---------- > > From: Davanum Srinivas[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:47 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: Jacek R. Ambroziak; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: new xsltc.jar > > > > Torsten, > > > > We cannot use xsltc in C2 as-is because of a bug > in their JAXP support: > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6312 > > > > Thanks, > > dims > > > > --- Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jacek R. Ambroziak wrote: > > > > > > > The performance bug seems to be fixed now. > > > > As I expected several other benchmarks benefit > > > > from the fix as well (decoy, patterns). > > > > > > > > The new magic numbers on my machine are > > > > > > > > XSLTC 1192 > > > > XT 471 > > > > Saxon 298 > > > > XalanJ 197 > > > > > > > > The infamous 'dbonerow' test doesn't need > rewriting > > > > into "match/if" anymore and 10 iterations > take about 1 second > > > > (900 MHz, J2SDK1.4) instead of 130 seconds as > before. > > > > > > > > That's not the end of the story 'cause I see > bunches > > > > of opportunities for further improvements. > > > > > > > > That translets are about 20 times faster now > > > > on 'dbonerow' than XT/Saxon/XalanJ is no big > surprise: > > > > since FORTRAN times compiled code ran faster > than interpreted. > > > > When eg. Saxon works on 'dbonerow' > > > > the only bytecodes that are actually executed > are the bytecodes > > > > Mike Kay put into saxon.jar. In the case of > XSLTC > > > > some bytecodes come from prepackaged > libraries, > > > > but (hopefully) most of the "action" is > handled by > > > > bytecodes 'freshly' generated > ('personalized'/specialized) > > > > for the stylesheet at hand. > > > > > > > > The new 'xsltc.jar' is available from me. > > > > > > wow!! ...instead of talking about number - why > not try it out. > > > What needs to be changed to use it with cocoon - > that's the only > > > question I see right now :) > > > -- > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, email: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > ===== > > Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/ > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > > http://sports.yahoo.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
