OK, problem reproduced. On to debugging :-) --Jacek
On Friday 22 February 2002 10:17 am, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Jacek, > > The code in the URL is a modified version of xsltc's > JAXPTransletOneTransformation sample. you use it exactly as you normally > run xsltc's JAXPTransletOneTransformation sample. > > No Magic here :) > > Thanks, > dims > > --- "Jacek R. Ambroziak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This one works; I am trying to understand what's wrong. > > Would be ideal if I had the data to reproduce the problem. > > > > --Jacek > > > > PS. Feels good to be back to my old project :-) > > > > On Friday 22 February 2002 10:01 am, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > Jacek, > > > > > > Bugzilla is down. Try this one: > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xalan-dev&m=101310215118028&w=2 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > dims > > > > > > --- Jacek Ambroziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I wouldn't mind removing any show-stoppers... > > > > The link you guys quote doesn't work, however :-( > > > > > > > > --Jacek > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "Lewis, Andrew J" > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > To whom must we beg for this to be a high priority? > > > > > > > > > > :) > > > > > : > > > > > > ---------- > > > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:47 AM > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Cc: Jacek R. Ambroziak; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: Re: new xsltc.jar > > > > > > > > > > > > Torsten, > > > > > > > > > > > > We cannot use xsltc in C2 as-is because of a bug > > > > > > > > > > in their JAXP support: > > > > > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6312 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > dims > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jacek R. Ambroziak wrote: > > > > > > > > The performance bug seems to be fixed now. > > > > > > > > As I expected several other benchmarks benefit > > > > > > > > from the fix as well (decoy, patterns). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The new magic numbers on my machine are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XSLTC 1192 > > > > > > > > XT 471 > > > > > > > > Saxon 298 > > > > > > > > XalanJ 197 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The infamous 'dbonerow' test doesn't need > > > > > > > > > > rewriting > > > > > > > > > > > > > into "match/if" anymore and 10 iterations > > > > > > > > > > take about 1 second > > > > > > > > > > > > > (900 MHz, J2SDK1.4) instead of 130 seconds as > > > > > > > > > > before. > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not the end of the story 'cause I see > > > > > > > > > > bunches > > > > > > > > > > > > > of opportunities for further improvements. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That translets are about 20 times faster now > > > > > > > > on 'dbonerow' than XT/Saxon/XalanJ is no big > > > > > > > > > > surprise: > > > > > > > > since FORTRAN times compiled code ran faster > > > > > > > > > > than interpreted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > When eg. Saxon works on 'dbonerow' > > > > > > > > the only bytecodes that are actually executed > > > > > > > > > > are the bytecodes > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Kay put into saxon.jar. In the case of > > > > > > > > > > XSLTC > > > > > > > > > > > > > some bytecodes come from prepackaged > > > > > > > > > > libraries, > > > > > > > > > > > > > but (hopefully) most of the "action" is > > > > > > > > > > handled by > > > > > > > > > > > > > bytecodes 'freshly' generated > > > > > > > > > > ('personalized'/specialized) > > > > > > > > > > > > > for the stylesheet at hand. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The new 'xsltc.jar' is available from me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wow!! ...instead of talking about number - why > > > > > > > > > > not try it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be changed to use it with cocoon - > > > > > > > > > > that's the only > > > > > > > > > > > > question I see right now :) > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, email: > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > ===== > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/ > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > > > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, email: > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ===== > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/ > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > > > http://sports.yahoo.com > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > ===== > Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/ > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > http://sports.yahoo.com _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
