That's the spirit of a leader.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: XSLTC


> Tom Amiro wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks Scott. Good characterization. We have already fixed the XSLTMark
> > bugs that Jacek did, but if there are other problems, we need to
> > know. Stefano's offer to prepare a detailed description of the
> > symptoms/bugs/suggestions/issues will help. As I mentioned in
> > another response related to this thread, I think Cocoon is using
> > nonstatic external Java functions, which XSLTC does not currently
> > support. So getting Cocoon to work 100% with XSLTC may not
> > be just a few minor bug fixes.
> 
> Ok, I understand that, but since Cocoon is moving away from the
> XSLT-generated sitemap java code (we have a tree interpreter that runs
> without compilation and it's equally fast), non-static extensions might
> not be a serious concern for us (could we make them static?).
> 
> I'm more concerned in *regular* use of XSLT, that is for runtime
> transformation or regular XML content.
> 
> Bruno reported to have that working and I'll try it myself this week and
> report back.
> 
> Anyway, people, don't worry, we'll get XSLTC working with Cocoon sooner
> or later, even if this requires changing both sides of the fence.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Stefano Mazzocchi      One must still have chaos in oneself to be
>                           able to give birth to a dancing star.
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                             Friedrich Nietzsche
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to