On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Diana Shannon wrote: > > Nick Airey wrote: > > > I vote for giving her commit access. Anyway, we can always roll back the > > versions in cvs if something goes too far off the rails. Not that I > > think it will. > > If I were making edits, I'd run them by the original authors for > comments/criticism before committing. I would also *welcome* any > technical review of my work prior to commits, particularly for new docs. > My hope is that there will be multiple iterations of documents, each > enhanced by feedback from authors, editors, and reviewers.
The true way of making people comment on stuff you've edited/written etc. is by commiting them into CVS so people on the list 1. have the cvs diff mails to see what you've changed/edited 2. can stand up and do fine work or corrections by iterating over those docs As soon as somthing is in CVS it's *ours* and not his or hers or yours anymore :) Giacomo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
