Good point. So bugzilla for consistency + personal email for efficiency (when the submitter knows whom to email).
----- Original Message ----- From: "Diana Shannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:22 AM Subject: Re: [Announcement] XMLForm HOWTO > > On Friday, May 24, 2002, at 09:04 AM, Ivelin Ivanov wrote: > > > Heidi, > > > > I've just applied your latest patch. > > > > Please use the version in CVS for future modifications. > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml- > > cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/xmlfor > > m/ > > > > The regular patch process through bugzilla is fine, however direct > > email to > > me would usually produce faster results, since I don't check the > > bugzilla > > list as frequently. > > Wouldn't it be better if authors like Heidi submitted patches to > bugzilla? They can always send separate emails to notify specific > committers (eager to patch) that their patch is in bugzilla. > > I'm just worried about sending mixed signals to authors. David wrote a > How-To about submitting patches via Bugzilla. If we start circumventing > Bugzilla, how sustainable will that be? > > Diana > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
