Another caching insect.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ulf Sauerland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:33 PM Subject: cinclude caching "bug" > Hello, > > there is a well known "bug" in the CachingCIncludeTransformer, which > prevents the caching algorithm from determining the correct cache validity > in some (almost every non trivial) cases. This makes the transformer useless > in the general practise. > > Months ago there was a diskussion about this in the cocoon-dev mailing list. > (see: http://www.mail-archive.com/cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org/msg01501.html ) > But I think the status quo is described at best in the bug database. > (see: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4641 ) > > Unfortunately I don't see any other possibilty to cache correctly a document > which includes other documents that are possibly outdated: The map:aggregate > feature is to inflexible and the XIncludeTransformer provides no caching at > all. > > My question now is: Does anyone know a workaround (i.e. using a map:action > to validate the cache) or if it is planned to fix the cinclude transformer > in the near future. > > Thanks for any suggestion on this matter, > Ulf Sauerland > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please check that your question has not already been answered in the > FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
