>> > This should be the same for "Solutions" also. Can one sentence sufficiently describe all such solutions? << Probably not - but that is what the link is for. I think any company offering Cocoon based solutions will have their own site set up for that sort of thing - and it's only a click away.
I discussed this with Sylvain and we both were not sure of the Apache side of things. Perhaps someone can comment on what is "allowed" in the sense of "tolerated". Thanks. Matthew -----Original Message----- From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: xml.apache.org/cocoon On Monday, June 3, 2002, at 08:52 AM, Matthew Langham wrote: > We need to make sure that these links are not misused as advertisement - > correct? I checked the Struts page and they seem to use links only. > Although > this is probably the "safest" - my suggestion would be to have a link > and a > one sentence description. I think such descriptions are user-friendly. Why download a whole page to determine relevancy? We can always edit a submission if someone takes undue advantage. > Is this allowed? *I* have no problem with it. > Example for consulting: > >>> > <link>S & N AG </link> > The open source group at S&N AG, Paderborn, Germany, offers consulting > services and support for Cocoon. > << > > This should be the same for "Solutions" also. Can one sentence sufficiently describe all such solutions? Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
