On Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 10:11 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Matthew Langham wrote: > >> I discussed this with Sylvain and we both were not sure of the >> Apache side >> of things. Perhaps someone can comment on what is "allowed" in >> the sense of >> "tolerated". Thanks. > > So, I would like to propose that a commercial entity that want to be > listed on those pages *MUST* have submitted at least a patch in the CVS > at some point and *MUST* be voted in by the committers. > > This should remove abuses and keep things sane. > > What do you think? > Sounds extremely sane to me. +1 I'll add myself ;) regards Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
