> From: Steven Noels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > I think we should simply use the usual dtd. It available, > can be used > > immediatly and offers all possibilites we need. > > I'm touchy about the validation thing AND the commonalities between > other projects: we need a common format & presentation across all > xml.apache.org projects, and I believe having a specific DTD for these > purposes can help. See > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=102327343231312&w=2 for > Konstantin contradicting himself on that ;-)
It should my English that makes me so contradictory ;) To make it clear I *am* for using semantical markups in the way that Steven proposed. We've already similar things when I've created a content for the front-page: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=101605719921655&w=2 And I am also agree that we should avoid lot of specific formats and try to reuse as much as possible without losing semantics. Konstantin. > > > And what about the active developers and emeritus > committers? I still > > believe a simple <s2 title="Active committers">, <s2 title="emeritus > > committers"> > > is sufficient. > > Have you seen the <category> elements? You could have as many > categories > of contributors as you want, and you're free to name them to your > personal liking. > > </Steven> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
