Carsten & Diana, > In the long term a specific DTD might make sense, but I totally agree > with Diana that now deciding for a DTD delays us too much. Let's use > the usual DTD (and I can start right now...) and if we want we can > later on switch to a specific one if everything is in place.
I upgraded the entire xml.apache.org *main* site yesterday evening to the new doc-v11.dtd and put it inside Forrest as a test case. These documents were *ugly*, while Cocoon's xdocs seem structurally pretty well shaped up to me (to easily automate this transformation process). So I assume migrating to doc-v11 will not be too much of a problem for the Cocoon project. The only outstanding issues I have with doc-v11 is hyperlinks, the title element/attribute discussion and some personal feelings about the poor table markup. Both are currently under discussion within the Forrest group, one has been raised as a vote, so we'll get somewhere sooner than later. I posted a vote on this subject some weeks ago (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102154299700003&r=1&w=2), and was pretty much amazed with the amount of responses I received :-( Aren't we a bit too conservative on transitioning Cocoon to Forrest? </Steven> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
