On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:49 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
> Question: should the documentation on the site reflect HEAD, the stable > development branch (2.0.3-dev), or the latest stable release? I'd > suggest > either of the latter two, as most people I assume will be using the > stable > release, and will expect stable documentation to go with it? I'm adding notices at the top of any doc related to 2.1. It's the same notice that appears in the WARNING note in the 2.1 branch. It's impossible, otherwise, to manually keep the branches in sync. You'd have different book.xml files, etc. I'm afraid it would introduce too many other problems. There aren't too many 2.1 docs, right now, only a handful. Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
