On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 01:41 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
> >> I'm adding notices at the top of any doc related to 2.1. It's the same >> notice that appears in the WARNING note in the 2.1 branch. > > Ah, that makes a lot of sense, and should help keep track of new > features > etc for people upgrading from older versions. RT: maybe it's worth > flagging versions (eg "Since: 2.0.1" or "Since: 2.1") on new > documentation > (or documentation about new features)? Although I guess the changelog is > used for this, too... No, it's not a RT at all, you're quite on target. It would be nice to include meta info in documents which relate to any component/version dependencies. It would be nice to automatically flag (during transformation) any doc which was "last checked" against an alpha or old release. This will inform/alert users (until an author/editor/reviewer could update the content and/or "last checked status"). FAQs, in particular, get out of date rather quickly. Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
