> From: Piroumian Konstantin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Bruno, > > > From: Bruno Dumon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
... > > Some errors I found in the schema: > > > > * Additional configuration attributes and child elements on the > > component declarations are apparently not allowed by the schema. > > e.g. <map:transformer name="foo" src="a.b.c.d.FooImpl" > > foo-factor="5"/> > > Child elements were allowed, I don't know why did you get this error. And > I'm not sure that configuration attributes are allowed on component > declarations. Attributes are allowed. However, I never seen component that uses attributes. > Can anybody confirm/explain/answer: is having configuration attributes > really needed/used? Not needed, you can always replace them with elements. But same holds true for XML itself: why have attributes in XML language? :) Vadim <snip/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
