> -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Noels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Subject: RE: [INFO] Sitemap XML Schema is available > > ... but what I see now is that a lot of people simply don't > know what > is possible inside a sitemap, and a Schema helps tremendously in this > case.
Oooh, did someone say more documentation? This would be a great help. And with tools such as Spy, it could automagically suggest options as the sitemap is edited. While having a free sitemap editor would be great, having one that I paid for and saves me a bunch of time is simply a tradeoff. But it needs the schema to be kept up to date. I was just looking at the archives a few days back, seems there was a similar initiative in the past to start and maintain a sitemap DTD. I think Schemas are easier to read and work with personally, but mebbe I'm weird. Anyway, an up-to-date DTD/Schema really makes life easy with an editor such as Spy. Anyway, putting it in the validation for TreeProcessor is something I am all for because it forces developers that require sitemap changes to update the schema, and an up-to-date schema has obvious implications for sitemap editors and documentation. Seems it makes good sense all around! It looks like Spy outputs PNG and HTML (or M$ word) for that fancy documentation, too bad it doesn't output SVG and XML, we could have sucked it right into the xdocs. What were they thinking? :) -b --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
