> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > >>Ditto. Just make sure that Excalibur is built with appropriate version > >>too - it has JDBC code too. > >> > > > > That's the problem I hinted at in my first email. Doing it correctly > > we would have to build two versions of excalibur (1.2 compatible and > > 1.4 compatible) ourselfs! And this is something I really don't want > > to do. > > This would result in a real nightmare and which version do we keep in > > our CVS/lib directory? > > Can we assure that Excalibur is the only component we have to take > > into account? > > > > Now, making our lifes easier I'm in favour of building only a 1.2 > > compatible version (excalibur and all other projects are mostly > > build with a JDK 1.2 and not JDK 1.4). > > > > So we could make a binary distribution for 1.2,1.3 and that would even > > run with 1.4 except perhaps when it comes to JDBC. So anyone really > > requiring JDBC 3.0 has to build Excalibur and Cocoon himself. > > Definately against this. > > Users with 1.4 will not be able to use the binary dist.
And source dist also! Mind wrong excalibur version. > Bleah :-P > Let's do them a favor, you compile it for them and call it dist-14. cocoon-2.0.3-se14-src cocoon-2.0.3-se14-bin 'se' for 'special edition' :) Vadim > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
