> > ESQL is certainly more developed, but it is not a replacement. Where > in SQLTransformer do you suspect code rot? Have people been > experiencing problems with it?
Open up the sourceode for the transformer, look at the amount of repetitive code.. . The SQL Transformer is also some many factors slower than ESQL. There is no shared source between them so fixes to each have to be done seperately. For instance I needed support for big numbers, I had to work in both places for consistancy. -Andy > > --Greg Weinger > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
