> > >> >> >-10 > >The SQLTransformer provides a very good alternative to ESQL, it is in >some use cases more flexible as it is a transformer and not a generator. >And you don't need XSP to use it. > >The SQLTransformer in its current state is not a 1.x construct, it has >been redesigned several times and works afaik absolutely perfect. It >is used in production environments without any problems. > > It is remarkably slower than ESQL. Okay if you feel this strongly about it then thats fine. Would you be against refactoring the two and moving the common constructs to common classes as Vadim suggested?
-Andy >Carsten > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
