On 24.Jul.2002 -- 07:15 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Have you compared the generated source files ? Are they different ?
Not significantly (namely creation date &c.) -- since esql.xsl has
changed significantly between these versions the esql sample differs
at great lengths. But implanting the newer esql code into the old code
base does not change run times.
> Is this related to pizza, as suggested by Berin (i.e. does switching
> back to Javac change something) ?
According to cocoon.xconf, both use pizza.
> If not, we'll have to find what changed in the engine...
I'm afraid so.
I've re-run the test using the "content" view, thus eleminating the
transformation step (but using a different serializer!).
"current"
simple 261 213 243 244 260 170 244 182 200 226
"224.3"
request 492 310 261 235 164 98 104 111 106 101
"198.2"
esql 260 144 164 270 246 87 93 86 91 89
"153.0"
samples
"19 6"
"current?cocoon-view=content"
simple 112 114 138 97 171 77 132 86 112 104
"114.3"
esql 138 138 138 139 110 113 106 104 101 112
"119.9"
request 264 148 131 146 131 76 122 139 116 117
"139.0"
"2002-04-20"
samples 20 35 17 22 17 17 23 17 18 36
"22.2"
simple 32 39 36 29 27 28 36 34 36 26
"32,3"
request 107 223 73 102 99 49 55 51 58 50
"86.7"
esql 119 122 142 127 41 40 46 39 47 35
"75.8"
"2002-04-20?cocoon-view=content"
simple 16 13 13 46 12 12 12 22 12 12
"17.0"
esql 74 18 20 22 17 18 15 16 18 30
"24.8"
request 14 13 13 12 12 19 12 12 11 12
"13.0"
Oh, I've redone the "simple" test because it had a great variance in
it. In general, variance is quite large. Occasionally, times around
500 ms appear within a sequence of 30 ms.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
