> From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > >Chris, > > > >What you use to measure time? > > > >I timed executing of simple.xsp in Cocoon "-D 20020420" and in Cocoon > >2.0.4-dev with the "for() time wget", and compared time reported by the > >Cocoon in access.log. > > > >After factoring out additional complexities in excalibur code > >(responsible for 8-9% performance loss), results were *identical*. > > > > > > Vadim, can you explain what are these additional complexities ? Is the > current version 8% slower because of changes of changes in excalibur ?
Ok, after second look, seems that these complexities are present in both versions, which means that old version also can go at least 9% faster. May be there are some other changes. Will take another look later. About complexity itself: I'm referring to this particular change in DefaultComponentFactory: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/src/java/org/ apache/avalon/excalibur/component/Attic/DefaultComponentFactory.java.dif f?r1=1.10&r2=1.11&diff_format=h Addition of private final Collection m_unreleased = new ArrayList(); slows down Cocoon from 8% (dynamic page) to something around 20% (page from cache). Vadim > Sylvain > > -- > Sylvain Wallez > Anyware Technologies Apache Cocoon > http://www.anyware-tech.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
