Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >>From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >>Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >> >>>Chris, >>> >>>What you use to measure time? >>> >>>I timed executing of simple.xsp in Cocoon "-D 20020420" and in Cocoon 2.0.4-dev >with the "for() time wget", and compared time reported by the Cocoon in access.log. >>> >>>After factoring out additional complexities in excalibur code >>>(responsible for 8-9% performance loss), results were *identical*. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Vadim, can you explain what are these additional complexities ? Is the >>current version 8% slower because of changes of changes in excalibur ? >> >> > >Ok, after second look, seems that these complexities are present in both >versions, which means that old version also can go at least 9% faster. >May be there are some other changes. Will take another look later. > > >About complexity itself: I'm referring to this particular change in >DefaultComponentFactory: > >http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/src/java/org/ >apache/avalon/excalibur/component/Attic/DefaultComponentFactory.java.dif >f?r1=1.10&r2=1.11&diff_format=h > >Addition of > > private final Collection m_unreleased = new ArrayList(); > >slows down Cocoon from 8% (dynamic page) to something around 20% (page >from cache). > >
Wow ! That's really bad :( Is the new container in Avalon faster ? Do we need to plan the switch to this new container in 2.1 ? Berin, can you please answer this question ? Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies Apache Cocoon http://www.anyware-tech.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
