On 09.Aug.2002 -- 11:53 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> Christian Haul wrote:
> > Since it affects only scratchpad in 2.0.4 and 2.1 is planned for 2003,
> > I'd like to sync this aspect in both branches again. Objections?
> >
> Go for it!
OK :-)
> > As a sidenote, if 2.1 will take some while as it seems, should we
> > consider to backport some 'cool' features? I volunteer to backport
> > usage of InputModules for the compiled sitemap. Mmh, would help to
> > have them moved out of scratchpad for that.
> >
> Hmm, I'm a little bit against this - as I see the problem that we
> start backporting more and more and finally have no differences
> between 2.1 and 2.0.x.
So? Really, why shouldn't 2.0.x evolve into 2.1 some day? At least if we
don't put unstable or incompatible features in it. Having a development
branch and a release branch is IMHO better than scratchpad :-) And the
linux kernel does that quite well.
> And I think 2003 is way too late for the 2.1 release, we should
> focus on the important things and get 2.1 before winter. Even if
> that means moving some things back into the scratchpad.
Absolutely.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
