> From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On 09.Aug.2002 -- 11:53 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > Christian Haul wrote: > > > Since it affects only scratchpad in 2.0.4 and 2.1 is planned for 2003, > > > I'd like to sync this aspect in both branches again. Objections? > > > > > Go for it! > > OK :-) > > > > As a sidenote, if 2.1 will take some while as it seems, should we > > > consider to backport some 'cool' features? I volunteer to backport > > > usage of InputModules for the compiled sitemap. Mmh, would help to > > > have them moved out of scratchpad for that. > > > > > Hmm, I'm a little bit against this - as I see the problem that we > > start backporting more and more and finally have no differences > > between 2.1 and 2.0.x.
Except the point that this is not possible because we have at least couple of quite radical changes... > So? Really, why shouldn't 2.0.x evolve into 2.1 some day? So, why not port stable features? Unless, of course, you state that input modules API is not stable yet. Vadim > At least if we > don't put unstable or incompatible features in it. Having a development > branch and a release branch is IMHO better than scratchpad :-) And the > linux kernel does that quite well. > > > And I think 2003 is way too late for the 2.1 release, we should > > focus on the important things and get 2.1 before winter. Even if > > that means moving some things back into the scratchpad. > > Absolutely. > > Chris. > -- > C h r i s t i a n H a u l > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
