Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: <large-snip/>
>I know it would be easier *right now* to name it 'controller' and forget >about all the above, but I ask you to think in 5 years from now, then >place your vote. > >I vote for <map:flow>. > > Lots of good arguments, the main one being that continuations have a broader usage range than simply the controller part of MVC. And we can still market <map:flow> as the MVC controller as long it is a buzzword. So I will abstain on <map:controller> against <map:flow> However, +1 for <map:call> with attributes "resource", "continuation" or "function". Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies Apache Cocoon http://www.anyware-tech.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
