Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > > On Monday, September 9, 2002, at 05:41 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > <large-snip/> > > > >> I know it would be easier *right now* to name it 'controller' and > >> forget > >> about all the above, but I ask you to think in 5 years from now, then > >> place your vote. > >> > >> I vote for <map:flow>. > >> > > > > Lots of good arguments, the main one being that continuations have a > > broader usage range than simply the controller part of MVC. And we can > > still market <map:flow> as the MVC controller as long it is a > buzzword. > > > > So I will abstain on <map:controller> against <map:flow> > > > > However, +1 for <map:call> with attributes "resource", "continuation" > > or "function". > > Good, I'm glad we all agree. I'll go ahead and implement <map:flow> as > declaration and <map:call> with its respective attributes. I like > <map:call> because is a very simple verb, with a well understood > meaning. > > I'll update later on what is the status and what still remains to be > done.
Great. -- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
