Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>Carsten, do what you want, I'm really fed up with error handling.
>>I'll start to complain myself now, let's see if it helps.
>>
>
> So I count this as a +10. Thanks.
It's a +1000 to have you write that code.
A -1000 for ranting.
We know that to see error messages without problems we need to buffer
all the result and flush it at the end.
We all know that this decreases percieved performance and enhances
memory usage.
We all know that making this configurable is the right thing to do so we
have both possibilities.
It was also said that making the response buffer bigger would have
solved the problem (see mail archives).
Other than that, there was no veto IIRC on making this happen, above all
if it's configurable.
While you are at it, remember that it is a TODO to make generators work
in handle-errors, remembering that redirects must be prohibited.
There is no need to ask us all really, we had already discussed this
zillion times.
Just do it.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
