Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > >>Carsten, do what you want, I'm really fed up with error handling. > >>I'll start to complain myself now, let's see if it helps. > >> > > > > So I count this as a +10. Thanks. > > It's a +1000 to have you write that code. > A -1000 for ranting. > > We know that to see error messages without problems we need to buffer > all the result and flush it at the end. > We all know that this decreases percieved performance and enhances > memory usage. > We all know that making this configurable is the right thing to do so we > have both possibilities. > > It was also said that making the response buffer bigger would have > solved the problem (see mail archives). > > Other than that, there was no veto IIRC on making this happen, above all > if it's configurable. > > While you are at it, remember that it is a TODO to make generators work > in handle-errors, remembering that redirects must be prohibited. > > There is no need to ask us all really, we had already discussed this > zillion times. > Sorry, but this is wrong - we had a vote on this and it got a "-1". So there is a need.
And I really would like to see others doing this...(not you). Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
