Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ovidiu Predescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:59 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: defaulting to a matcher when another one is not present
> > 
> > 
> > On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 01:28  AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > 
> > > Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have the following problem. I want to write a <map:match 
> > >> pattern="**.html"> matcher in the top-level sitemap, and have it 
> > >> invoked for most of the HTML page generation. However I'd like this 
> > >> rule to be overwritten in sub-sitemaps, e.g. if a sub-sitemap 
> > >> implements a  rule with a similar pattern, this rule should take 
> > >> precendence. This would be very similar to the precedence rule in 
> > >> XSLT, allowing developers to define catch-all rules, while still 
> > >> permitting the rule to be rewritten.
> > >>
> > >> Do we have something like this which can implement this behavior?
> > >
> > >
> > > What if we could "come back" from a <map:mount> to the parent sitemap 
> > > if no pattern matched in the subsitemap ?
> > 
> > I think this will do it. Should we vote for extending the semantics of 
> > <map:mount> this way?
> > 
> > I'm +1.
> > 
> Currently I'm -0 but with a tendency to -1.
> 
> Why? I see these reasons:
> 1) This is an incompatible change - currently if nothing matches in the 
>    subsitemap, the error handler is invoked and people rely on this, so
>    this will break many installations.
> 2) I think it is more natural if a sub sitemap is invoked that it is 
>    the sole responsibility of this sub sitemap to process the request.
> 3) Before you consider implementing this simple sounding change, have a
>    look at all the component manager and source handling stuff which
>    takes place when a sub sitemap is invoked - it's very difficult
>    to implement your wantet behaviour without breaking everything.

Without considering the technical issues, I still agree with Carsten because of 
point 1 and 2.

Consider it a -1

-- 
Stefano Mazzocchi                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to